"Nothing Is Private"

I finally saw Alan Ball's Nothing Is Private this afternoon, and there's no question about it being smart, thoughtful and high-grade. It's not 100% flawless (I had two or three speed-bump issues) but it's certainly a sturdy, complex character drama that's 100% deserving of respect. It's obviously one of the most original, daring films about adolescent sexuality ever delivered by a quasi-mainstreamer. It's also a sharp look at racism (and not just the American-bred kind) and a sobering portrait of the rifts and tensions between American and Middle-Eastern mindsets.


Nothing Is Private director-writer Alan Ball prior to today's Cineplex Odeon public screening -- 9.10.07, 1:40 pm

And all of this out of a fairly simple period drama, set in a Houston suburb around the time of the Gulf War, about a 13 year-old half-Lebanese, half-Irish girl named Jasira (Summer Bishil), and what happens as she gradually decides, under the fiercely oppressive watch of her Lebanese dad (Peter Macdissi), to explore/ indulge her budding sexuality with two older guys -- a randy but nice-enough African-American high schooler in his mid teens (Eugene Jones) and a sleazy neighborhood dad in his early 40s (Aaron Eckhart).

It's based on Alicia Erian's "Towelhead," a respected novel that was published three or four years ago.

The word around the festival is that Nothing Is Private is a problem movie because of the sexual stuff, and the latter relationship in particular. ("It's too shocking and disturbing to get a strong release...nobody serious will dare touch it," one guy opined earlier today). But it's not exploitation...not even a little bit. It's a smartly written thing with all kinds of intrigues, balances and counterweights built into each character, and an earnest residue of humanity seeping through at the finish.

Even Eckhart's character, scumbag that he is, has tics and shadings that make him more than just a thoughtless statutory rapist. Even Jasira's dad, a dictatorial racist thug of the first order, comes off as somewhat sympathetic at times. And each one is his own way cares for Jasira. And despite the dark sexual currents (and as odd as this sound), it's also a fairly amusing film. Really. It's really boils down to being a "neighborhood folks and their quirks" movie that...okay, is a little bit icky in two or three scenes but isn't nearly as icky in a general sense as you might expect.


Summer Bushill in Alan Ball's Nothing Is Private

Ball is careful not to fetishize Bushill's Jasira character in any way, shape or form. She's naked in a few scenes (doing the deed, getting pube-shaved, etc.) but next to nothing is "shown." Bishil was 17 or 18 when the film was shot (she just turned 19 last July), and Ball has been very, very careful about not including anything that might be construed as even a faint turn-on.

Her acting throughout the film is somewhere between fine and quite good for the most part, but she also has scenes here and there that feel underplayed and awkward. Plus she looks tiny as hell -- she seems about as tall as a typical eight year-old -- and that's obviously discomforting, given the context.

And I wasn't that big on Newton Thomas Sigel's cinematography, which is all shadowy and burnished and amber-lit. It seems affected. Surburban Houston neighborhoods are dull, flatly-lit places (I'm sorry to say I've visited them), and I don't see the point of trying to make the film look like the Vito Corleone sequences in Gordon Willis's The Godfather, Part II.

There's no distributor on board (as far as I know), but why isn't there at least a bare-bones Nothing Is Private website? And why can't I find any photos?

But this is a film that definitely deserves a better rap than it's been getting so far. It's Alan Ball-ish every step of the way, and for me that means highly observant, well-acted, piercing, occasionally trippy and respectful of human beings. There are two TIFF press and industry showings happening tomorrow, so we'll see what happens.

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on September 10, 2007 at 2:15 PM

comment #1

Abbey Normal Author Profile Page says ...

"getting pube-shaved"? Hmmm. It'll be interesting to see how that's not sexual.

Posted by Abbey Normal Author Profile Page at September 10, 2007 4:26 PM

comment #2

thatmovieguy Author Profile Page says ...

Abbey: It's not sensual at all; it happens offscreen. You just see her wearing a bikini bottom with shaving cream on her pelvis. And yes, the film is extraordinary. In his Q&A afterward, Ball noted that he was trying to make a film that went against the usual "once a victim of sexual abuse, always a victim of sexual abuse" theme that dominates so many dramas about men and women in inappropriate relationships. He's succeeded. But given the way so many Americans seem to thrive on the idea of playing the victim -- "Somebody wronged me and now I have a license to be a total basket case for the rest of my life" -- I wonder how the film will be received. It's a remarkable piece of work, though, with excellent performances by everyone and superb writing.

Posted by thatmovieguy Author Profile Page at September 10, 2007 4:41 PM

comment #3

Jay T. Author Profile Page says ...

This sounds like the perfect movie for a gay man to direct... much more difficult to accuse him of exploitation in this case than a heterosexual male director.

Posted by Jay T. Author Profile Page at September 10, 2007 5:53 PM

comment #4

btwnproductions Author Profile Page says ...

I hear (very) faint echoes of Mysterious Skin.

Posted by btwnproductions Author Profile Page at September 10, 2007 6:07 PM

comment #5

T. Holly Author Profile Page says ...

I was looking for a motivation, never let it get too lofty. Q&A's should be L&M's (Leads and Misleads). It sounds very original and also like a total mess; a high quality feature length film school project for the director, but since it's sold in every territory, everyone's probably square, and it'll get a little theatrical action in the U.S. before doing alright on DVD.

Posted by T. Holly Author Profile Page at September 10, 2007 6:13 PM

comment #6

danny Author Profile Page says ...

I think it's a fantastic movie - oscar calibre - Peter Macdissi and Aaron Eckhart give a smashing performance, oscar worthy. Plus Ball's writing is incomparable: Gritty, funny and soo real.

Danny.

Posted by danny Author Profile Page at September 10, 2007 6:48 PM

comment #7

JD Author Profile Page says ...

Jeff (and Danny) is high. This movie is a mess.

Posted by JD Author Profile Page at September 10, 2007 9:31 PM

comment #8

JD Author Profile Page says ...

And btwproductions, Mysterious Skin is an infintely better, more humane film.

Posted by JD Author Profile Page at September 10, 2007 9:33 PM

comment #9

Nick Carroway Author Profile Page says ...

In light of last week's Nikki Finke/James Mangold blow-up, does anyone else find it funny that Wells is wondering where he can find pictures from "Nothing Is Private"?

Posted by Nick Carroway Author Profile Page at September 10, 2007 11:48 PM

comment #10

Sean Author Profile Page says ...

"much more difficult to accuse him of exploitation in this case than a heterosexual male director."

That depends. He would be less likely to be accused of exploiting the actress, I guess, but either way he's possibly exploiting the situation.

I think it's unusual that he's written two features and they both deal with this specific sort of inappropriate relationship.

But, to be clear, I don't think he's exploitative (neccessarily; I'd have to see this); just retreading the same ground again.

Posted by Sean Author Profile Page at September 11, 2007 3:52 PM

comment #11

Z.D. Author Profile Page says ...

"In light of last week's Nikki Finke/James Mangold blow-up, does anyone else find it funny that Wells is wondering where he can find pictures from "Nothing Is Private"?"

Funny ... and pathetic. Does anyone have Alan Ball's e-mail address so Wells can ask for some stills or unused footage?

Posted by Z.D. Author Profile Page at September 11, 2007 5:45 PM

Leave a comment