Verbal Support

If anyone doubts yesterday's item about Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull being 140 minutes plus, here's a video clip (posted Sunday, 4.13) of composer John Williams saying the film is "seven reels long, and each reel is 20 minutes."

Bamboozled<< previous | next >>Galumph Note

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on April 16, 2008 at 8:07 AM

comment #1

DavidF Author Profile Page says ...

Ah, yup. That sounds like 140 minutes, alright.

Was anyone doubting it? Why the big deal, really?
The other movies were right around the 120 minute mark, all the Star Wars prequels were in the 130-140 range and, for all the complaints, no one said they were annoyingly long.

Yeah, pop corn movies are longer than they used to be (in general) but all we're talking about here is 15-20 mins, not some Return of the King-style Indy Jones flick. Yeesh.

Posted by DavidF Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 8:19 AM

comment #2

Howlingman Author Profile Page says ...

Whatever. A shitty 90 minute movie is the Bataan death march. A classic 160 is bliss. As Indy himself would paraphrase, "It's not the length, its the content."

Posted by Howlingman Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 8:22 AM

comment #3

Bocephus Author Profile Page says ...

The Star Wars prequels were annoyingly, unbearably long. There, I said it.

Posted by Bocephus Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 8:23 AM

comment #4

Rich S. Author Profile Page says ...

Ditto, Bocephus.

Posted by Rich S. Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 8:27 AM

comment #5

thasos Author Profile Page says ...

It could also mean that the movie's 126 minutes long or whatever. Few reels are as long as 20 minutes. And the last reel could be five minutes for all we know. The only news here is that Williams clears up any doubt on whether or not he knows the multiplication table.

Posted by thasos Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 9:14 AM

comment #6

p.Vice Author Profile Page says ...

Why is this an issue? We're all going to see it regardless of how long it is.

Posted by p.Vice Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 9:34 AM

comment #7

Howlingman Author Profile Page says ...

60 combined comments will confirm p.Vice's statement.

Besides, it's a strange world where people will gripe about 2hrs 20 in a movie theater, yet have no problem with 8 hours at a desk, 4 hours in front of the TV.

As long as it's good, who cares how long it is?

Posted by Howlingman Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 9:42 AM

comment #8

BlueRaymondBabbit Author Profile Page says ...

I have a big problem with 8 hours at a desk, which is why I'm on this site right now.

Posted by BlueRaymondBabbit Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 10:01 AM

comment #9

Wrecktum Author Profile Page says ...

"It could also mean that the movie's 126 minutes long or whatever. Few reels are as long as 20 minutes."

The shortest 7 reel show I've ever seen is 117 minutes. There's practically no way that a 7 reel movie would be exactly 140 minutes. It has to be less. The highest it'll top out at is 139.

Posted by Wrecktum Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 10:21 AM

comment #10

Edward Author Profile Page says ...

Of course none of us astute students of cinema have never sat on the couch for the entirety of a bad movie, we always turn them off and read a book instead.

Posted by Edward Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 10:24 AM

comment #11

Wrecktum Author Profile Page says ...

Oh, I forgot to say that reel 1 is usually a lot shorter than other reels so that the studio can attach a trailer. I can't image they cut a 1800 foot reel 1.

Posted by Wrecktum Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 10:32 AM

comment #12

Cadavra Author Profile Page says ...

And don't forget 7 or 8 minutes of end credits, which almost everybody will walk out on.

Posted by Cadavra Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 11:20 AM

comment #13

aussieanywhere Author Profile Page says ...

Believe it or not:

Oz exhibitors have been told to expect a duration of the SEX AND THE CITY - THE MOVIE in the 140-145min range.

Posted by aussieanywhere Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 5:35 PM

comment #14

The Bandsaw Vigilante Author Profile Page says ...

Interesting. The running lengths of the previous three INDY flicks were each under the two-hour mark, or about right at it (RAIDERS in particular).

Given Spielberg's middle-years penchant for longer running times in the past decade or more, though, can't say as I'm surprised by this.

Posted by The Bandsaw Vigilante Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 6:12 PM

comment #15

bill Author Profile Page says ...


welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!
welcome to wealthykiss dot co m!

Posted by bill Author Profile Page at April 16, 2008 7:07 PM

comment #16

thatmovieguy Author Profile Page says ...

Just got word this afternoon that the critics' screenings will be on or around May 18 because of the movie's debut at Cannes.

And thank you, Bill, your "wealthykiss" is almost as good as True Love's Kiss.

Posted by thatmovieguy Author Profile Page at April 17, 2008 4:07 PM

Posted by porno Author Profile Page at July 14, 2010 3:39 PM

comment #18

build muscles Author Profile Page says ...

Indiana jones is really an amazing film. I have seen it numerious time. what s your opinion about this movie.

Posted by build muscles Author Profile Page at June 24, 2011 11:22 AM

Leave a comment