December 31
January 2
Cargo 200
January 7
Silent Light
January 9
How About You
Yonkers Joe
January 16
Cherry Blossoms
January 21
Of Time and the City
Three thoughts came to mind on Thursday when I read various accounts about some passionate mucky-muck involving CBS News Baghdad correspondent Lara Logan, a married US State Department contractor named Joe Burkett and CNN international correspondent Michael Ware.
The first two thoughts were (a) this is private material and nobody's business so why don't they leave her alone? and (b) passion is as passion does, and is no big deal.
Logan has been a feisty and outspoken reporter about the war and probably has a serious fire going in the furnace whatever the subject or concern. On top of which there's always something strangely erotic in the air when there's a lot of random death and danger floating about, and hence a sense of impermanence. The more ghastly or threatening the surroundings, the more likely it is that like-minded professionals of a certain age are going to get down in the heat of the moment. Remember the "terror fucking" phenomenon that happened in Manhattan in the days following 9/11?
The third thought is that Logan's story since she's been on the Baghdad beat would make for a good filmed drama. The considerate way to go about it would be to use the facts (romantic Baghdad triangle, emotions at a fever pitch, divorce proceeding, bullets whizzing past lovers' heads, IEDs exploding) but with made-up names and perhaps a slightly fictionalized story line just to blur things up. Roger Donaldson's Under Fire, which used actual events that happened in Nicaragua, had some of this element, as I recall.
That said, it seemed disingenuous that Brian Stelter's 6.26 N.Y. Times story reported that CBS News has just decided to base Logan in Washington, D.C., with a new title -- chief foreign affairs correspondent -- rather than in London, without at least briefly acknowledging the Baghdad mess. I mean, c'mon...it happened and some of the facts made the tabloids and now she's getting reassigned. People's private business is their private business, but once the snake is out of the box you can't pretend it's not there.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on June 28, 2008 at 2:43 PM
comment #1
EOTW
says ...
Fighting over a piece of ass like this? What's the problem here?
Posted by EOTW
at June 28, 2008 3:35 PM
comment #2
Jeffrey Kunze
says ...
"Remember the "terror fucking" phenomenon that happened in Manhattan in the days following 9/11?"
Huh? How does Wells know about this? I never heard anything about terror fucking before.
Posted by Jeffrey Kunze
at June 28, 2008 3:51 PM
comment #3
Doug Pratt
says ...
"chief foreign affairs correspondent"
nyuk, nyuk, nyuk
Posted by Doug Pratt
at June 28, 2008 4:03 PM
comment #4
T. S. Idiot
says ...
We've come a long way from His Girl Friday.
Posted by T. S. Idiot
at June 28, 2008 5:01 PM
comment #5
Scott Feinberg
says ...
What is the terror-fucking phenomenon?
PS: Haha T.S. Idiot
Posted by Scott Feinberg
at June 28, 2008 5:09 PM
comment #6
iamjoe
says ...
"terror fucking"
THAT's just awesome., well done.
Posted by iamjoe
at June 28, 2008 5:18 PM
comment #7
frankbooth
says ...
http://archive.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/09/21/terror/
Posted by frankbooth
at June 28, 2008 5:19 PM
comment #8
The Pope
says ...
At the very outside, the reassignment may be due to the assumption that Ms. Logan's integrity as a journalist may have been compromised by having an affair with a US State Department contractor. That he was married just adds to the spice (but it shouldn't).
But to ask the more obvious question... would it have happened to Michael Ware if he had been carrying on... oh, wait a minute... he was... has he been reassigned?
Finally, good thing you run a blog, Jeff. Your story pitch is banal and clichéd... right down to the exploding IED. Next thing, you;d be casting Michelle Pfeiffer and Robert Redford... oh wait a minte...
Posted by The Pope
at June 28, 2008 5:55 PM
comment #9
CinemaPhreek
says ...
Because we should just acknowledge something as a legitimate news story once it hits the tabloids.
Just wondering, is it possible to get mental whip-lash from bloggers who talk about high-brow, art vs trash one post and then jump right down into the muck the next?
Posted by CinemaPhreek
at June 28, 2008 8:29 PM
comment #10
deadre
says ...
I think she's fabulous. Gorgeous, smart, gutsy, this just makes her more interesting.
Posted by deadre
at June 28, 2008 10:08 PM
comment #11
deadre
says ...
I think she's fabulous. Gorgeous, smart, gutsy, this just makes her more interesting.
Posted by deadre
at June 28, 2008 10:08 PM
comment #12
btwnproductions
says ...
"Terror-fucking" was like WMD: Everyone heard about it, no one uncovered any.
Posted by btwnproductions
at June 29, 2008 5:55 AM
comment #13
Ogami Itto
says ...
On top of which there's always something strangely erotic in the air when there's a lot of random death and danger floating about, and hence a sense of impermanence. The more ghastly or threatening the surroundings ...
Spoken like somebody who's never been anywhere near a combat zone.
Posted by Ogami Itto
at June 29, 2008 7:29 AM
comment #14
rgmax99
says ...
Here be my comments re this thing:
http://suburbanvoodoo.blogspot.com/2008/06/leave-ms-logan-alone.html
Posted by rgmax99
at June 29, 2008 7:48 PM
Post a comment