It's no secret that the plot by German military officers to assassinate Adolf Hitler in the waning days of World War II failed, and that the conspirators -- including Col. Claus von Stauffenberg, the character portrayed by Tom Cruise in Valkyrie -- were shot. So it's no spoiler to say that I want to see Cruise eat lead at the end of Bryan Singer's long-awaited historical thriller.
I want to see him grimace, convulse and fall to the ground. No cutaways, no panning up to gray skies over Berlin as the execution squad captain yells "fire!" and no Che-style POV shots ending with a fade-to-white because Soderbergh owns that for now. Not because I dislike Cruise -- I never have -- and want to see him "shot", but because that's the story and because Stanley Kubrick didn't cut away when those three soldiers were executed in Paths of Glory. And neither did Bruce Beresford in his Breaker Morant execution scene.
I'm saying this because the Hollywood political rulebook states on page 27 that movie stars rarely die on-screen in brutually realistic fashion. They die off-screen like Gary Cooper did in For Whom The Bell Tolls, or like Paul Newman and Robert Redford did in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. They talk things over and say their peace before they die. They die with dignity like Marlon Brando did in Last Tango in Paris. They die quietly (like Leonardo DiCaprio's death from hypothermia in Titanic) and then ascend to heaven.
I'm just saying that cutting away when Cruise and his co-conspirators get shot at the end will be a chickenshit kowtow move on the part of Singer. Fair warning.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on September 26, 2008 at 10:19 AM
comment #1
p.Vice
says ...
I want to see him die Braveheart style... except I bet his torturers would discover that he had already been castrated.
Posted by p.Vice
at September 26, 2008 10:40 AM
comment #2
Alan Cerny
says ...
Well, I think the movie's PG-13 (whatever that means today) and I highly doubt you'll see any bullets actually enter the body and rip him to shreds. Are we talking Peckinpahesque squib explosions, here?
Posted by Alan Cerny
at September 26, 2008 10:44 AM
comment #3
Alan Cerny
says ...
It would be nice, actually, to see Cruise buy it like that hapless executive against the ED-209 in ROBOCOP.
Posted by Alan Cerny
at September 26, 2008 10:45 AM
comment #4
Howlingman
says ...
Damn it Jeff, that's a pretty big spoiler for those of us who've been under a rock our entire lives!
Jerk.
Posted by Howlingman
at September 26, 2008 10:52 AM
comment #5
snoop
says ...
So I'm not throwing a spoiler up on who gets it, but that's why you've got to love the deaths in Burn After Reading.
Posted by snoop
at September 26, 2008 10:54 AM
comment #6
EnglishBob
says ...
Is it me or is watching most trailers these days just like staring into a rapidly increasing strobe-light?
Posted by EnglishBob
at September 26, 2008 10:57 AM
comment #7
jc
says ...
Not to kowtow to the establishment, but I'm kind of glad that I didn't see Butch and Sundance get slaughtered.
Posted by jc
at September 26, 2008 10:57 AM
comment #8
EnglishBob
says ...
Oh, and DiCaprio certainly didn't "die quietly" at the end of The Departed. (I trust that's no longer a spoiler!)
Posted by EnglishBob
at September 26, 2008 10:58 AM
comment #9
chicbn872
says ...
The first killing in "Burn After Reading" was acceptable, twisted, and brave. The second one? Awful. That second character's death was pointless and disgusting considering the character was the only good and decent person in the movie.
Posted by chicbn872
at September 26, 2008 10:59 AM
comment #10
Monument
says ...
Jeff can you start banning people who complain about spoilers in movies based on historical events? Maybe some kind of ignorance penalty? It must be a mighty big rock some of you boys are living under.
Posted by Monument
at September 26, 2008 11:01 AM
comment #11
Rich S.
says ...
Don't forget Breaker Morant: "Shoot straight, you bastards! Don't make a mess of it!"
Posted by Rich S.
at September 26, 2008 11:07 AM
comment #12
Howlingman
says ...
Hopefully not before banning people who don't get when a joke's a joke.
Posted by Howlingman
at September 26, 2008 11:08 AM
comment #13
Monument
says ...
Tell better jokes then, it's often hard to tell between idiocy and sarcasm around here. But I'm glad to know you're not an ignoramus.
Posted by Monument
at September 26, 2008 11:15 AM
comment #14
rr3333
says ...
Why no accents like Siegfried from 'Get Shmart'?
Posted by rr3333
at September 26, 2008 11:16 AM
comment #15
ScottMendelson
says ...
Not to be annoying, chicbn872, but your Burn After Reading comments do constitute a massive spoiler.
SPOILERS...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I know you're being vague. But had I not seen the movie already, and then gone to see it, I would have figured out which character you were referring to within the first fifteen-minutes. Since it's painfully obvious which character is the only one of the group that isn't selfish and conniving. Sometimes, in context, even vague references such as that constitute major spoilers. Again, not to be a prick, but you might have given away more than you intended.
Posted by ScottMendelson
at September 26, 2008 11:23 AM
comment #16
Mark
says ...
I know there was a thread about this topic before, but i thought it worth repeating that Kurt Russell's death in Posiedon is top-tier torture. Good stuff.
btw, that trailer is infinitely better than the previous one.
Posted by Mark
at September 26, 2008 11:24 AM
comment #17
Joshua Mooney
says ...
Right fucking on, Rich S. That final scene in "Breaker Morant" is truly stunning and powerful, and has stayed with me since I first saw it almost a quarter-century ago. The whole film is right up there with "Paths of Glory" and "Apocalypse Now," in my book.
Posted by Joshua Mooney
at September 26, 2008 11:27 AM
comment #18
BurmaShave
says ...
chicbn872 you sound like someone making fun of people who complain about Coen Brothers movies.
Posted by BurmaShave
at September 26, 2008 11:28 AM
comment #19
bildeaux
says ...
Thanks a bunch chicbn872. As Scott Mendelson noted, now everyone will know that the janitor who finds the CIA data in the gym gets it in the end. You should be ashamed!
b.
Posted by bildeaux
at September 26, 2008 11:30 AM
comment #20
thorsen1nk
says ...
1) This trailer is VASTLY superior than the other ones--really plays up the suspense element, even if it's a foregone conclusion.
2) I totally agree that it should show the executions. They could do it from a medium-long shot and show him just drop and still make it effective and keep the PG-13. I think the importance is the finality and the suddenness of seeing a heroic figure just blown away a la Breaker Morant
3) DiCaprio shying away from a brutal end, Jeff? I have two words for you: The Departed
Posted by thorsen1nk
at September 26, 2008 11:36 AM
comment #21
thorsen1nk
says ...
oh and to all the burn after reading spoiler posters: Fuck you.
Posted by thorsen1nk
at September 26, 2008 11:37 AM
comment #22
Majorian99
says ...
Right on Mr. Mooney! Couldn't agree more on your views on BREAKER MORANT, PATHS OF GLORY and APOCALYPSE NOW -- although i would subtly add THE THIN RED LINE to that privileged few titles...
Posted by Majorian99
at September 26, 2008 11:38 AM
comment #23
lazarus
says ...
Jeff, I wouldn't call Brando's death in Last Tango "dignified", unless you consider sticking a piece of chewing gum on the railing of a balcony before you curl up and expire some kind of classy exit. I thought it was meant to be very unglorious, and rather pathetic.
Posted by lazarus
at September 26, 2008 11:50 AM
comment #24
Krazy Eyes
says ...
It's bad enough that the "second death" in Burn After Reading was completely spoiled in the trailer -- unless you believe that Malkovich has horrible aim with a hatchet.
Posted by Krazy Eyes
at September 26, 2008 11:51 AM
comment #25
Deathtongue_Groupie
says ...
Really, you knew that? Why, because when the movie was announced you went to Wikipedia to look it up. Because outside of the right-wingers on here (who always know a disturbing way too much minutia about the Third Reich), I doubt very seriously you knew the fate's of every single person who has since been identified with the plot.
Because, to use one of your challenges, I bet if I put a gun to your head and told you I would fire when you screwed up the plotter's outcome, eventually your brains would be on the wall.
Posted by Deathtongue_Groupie
at September 26, 2008 12:05 PM
comment #26
Hi Hitler
says ...
Fear not.
Having seen the film, I can tell you firsthand that the filmmakers pull no punches at the end.
This film is gonna surprise a lot of people...almost as much as the fact that it garnered a PG-13 surprised me.
Posted by Hi Hitler
at September 26, 2008 12:06 PM
comment #27
snoop
says ...
chicbn872 says ...
The first killing in "Burn After Reading" was acceptable, twisted, and brave. The second one? Awful. That second character's death was pointless and disgusting considering the character was the only good and decent person in the movie.
I would actually venture to say that the first character was relatively good and decent as well. Consider everything that person did was unselfish. Now I'm entering spoiler territory as well though, so... apologies.
Posted by snoop
at September 26, 2008 12:06 PM
comment #28
Amazing Larry
says ...
First of all, if you haven't seen BURN AFTER READING yet, what are you waiting for? Get thee to the movie, sir.
Second of all, is it really spoilers that characters will die in a frakkin' Coen Brothers movie? That's like complaining about the bad language in a Tarantino film: it's their TRADEMARK. Sudden, violent deaths happen in EVERY Coen Brothers flick.
Third of all, if being spoiled on a movie is the worst thing to happen to you, then you've got a goddamn wonderful life, slappy. People are losing their jobs, families are losing their homes, and kids are starving... but please excuse me while I weep some tears because you were spoiled. Two words: Big and Deal.
Jeesus, I am sick to death of Tom Cruise. Any movie that has him in it doesn't get a penny from me, ever. I'm either avoiding it entirely (in the case of VALKRIE) or sneaking in or Netflix'ing it later (if he should happen to work with somebody interesting like C. Crowe or PTA). I'm tired of him stinking up the movies and I just want him to go the hell away.
Posted by Amazing Larry
at September 26, 2008 12:14 PM
comment #29
George Prager
says ...
I want to die like Don Stroud in BLOODY MAMA.
Posted by George Prager
at September 26, 2008 12:21 PM
comment #30
Spacesheik
says ...
Since this is a Bryan Singer film, expect 1:30 hours of angst, 30 seconds of action and an anticlimax set in a hospital.
But who knows? Since its a Tom Cruise flick he might survive the execution while his peers die and get to pontificate the German chancellor on the evils of Nazism a la LAST SAMURAI.
Seriously though I am only going to see this film because of the stellar British supporting cast (Branagh, Stamp etc).
Posted by Spacesheik
at September 26, 2008 12:40 PM
comment #31
hcat
says ...
The movie will end with Cruise wearing a fake mustache and nursing his wounds in South America.
Posted by hcat
at September 26, 2008 1:56 PM
comment #32
huisache
says ...
I wanted to see that murderous scumbag Che Guevara get his in the end and with less dignity than all the people he murdered in the soccer stadium. I gather he is portrayed as a selfless patriot who was only trying to do what was best for the people but ultimately fell a little short of his goals.
Like Hitler.
Posted by huisache
at September 26, 2008 4:11 PM
comment #33
madskrilla
says ...
Mr. Wells, I respectfully disagree. You can show a huge star like Cruise (or Pitt, or Jolie, or Clooney, etc) die on screen and it just isn't that much affecting -- we all know they're alive and well, we saw them on the gossip blogs right before we left for the movie theater.
A great master like Malick knows this. That's why he cast actors who were then unknown as the cannon fodder in THE THIN RED LINE, and big stars in minor roles (and they stay alive)
THE DIVING BELL AND THE BUTTERFLY really broke your heart because nobody knew that French actor. Johnny Depp, who was initially supposed to get the role, would have been splendid in it -- but his Calvary and death would not have been as affecting
Posted by madskrilla
at September 26, 2008 4:18 PM
comment #34
Joshua Mooney
says ...
Hey, Majorian99, of course "Thin Red Line" is a worthy addition to my list, but I wasn't trying to be cmoprehensive, in any case. In some ways, "TRL," which I was just watching again this evening, is the best of the bunch. It's flawed-- hell they're all flawed, hell, any great work of art is somehow flawed. Buit we're lucky to have them.
Posted by Joshua Mooney
at September 26, 2008 7:55 PM
comment #35
lionsfan
says ...
This is kind of a grisly thread. "Valkyrie" might prove even grislier if, as really happened, it shows several of the July 20 conspirators hanged by the SS and left to writhe upon meathooks. (I kind of think that'd be an appropriate fate for, say, Kenneth Branagh. Or for Xenu!) These executions, perhaps comprising the first genuine "snuff movie," were supposedly filmed and shown to Hitler for his enjoyment. They have never surfaced since, but rumors abounded for a long tiime as to who had them and what they paid for them.
Von Stauffenberg was, however, shot to death with a few others. The yearly commemoration of their death at what was then the hq for (I believe) German military intelligence draws something like 5-6 ever-more-elderly mourners tops. And no press or citizens of "young," post-WWII Germany, the Germany which lived through the Baader-Meinhof gang and adulation of Che and is today arguably the most pacifist-leaning country in Europe. Some coverage, anyway recreation, of this annual event might thus be the proper, best way to end "Valkyrie."
The motives of the July 20 plotters against Hitler were many and complex. Some were dreamy Catholics, some unremorseful militarists who wished to unite with the Allies to fight what they perceived as the "real" enemy in Russia, still others were Christian socialists, idealists, etc. Hardly any of them, however, seemingly had anything more than a vague idea of the enormity of the task which awaited them if they'd been successful in killing Hitler, in negotiating with the Allies and rulling Germany by themselves.(To say they were basically well-meaning, but very brave, amateurs is probably a fair judgment.) I wonder how much of this complexity will even be hinted at in the forthcoming movie.
Posted by lionsfan
at September 26, 2008 8:43 PM
comment #36
D.Z.
says ...
huisache: "I gather he is portrayed as a selfless patriot who was only trying to do what was best for the people but ultimately fell a little short of his goals. Like Hitler."
Or Swamp Fox in "The Patriot"...
Posted by D.Z.
at September 26, 2008 9:29 PM
comment #37
BurmaShave
says ...
D.Z. are you a 300 year old Native American? Shut the fuck up about Swamp Fox, that damned movie is fictional.
Posted by BurmaShave
at September 26, 2008 10:44 PM
comment #38
frankbooth
says ...
I expect that a fair number of twenty and thirty-somethings will turn out for this, if only to see what cool, Mission Impossible-style tricks Tom uses to assassinate Hitler.
Posted by frankbooth
at September 27, 2008 2:06 AM
comment #39
Circumvrent
says ...
Jeff, did you just give away the last shot of Che? Not the "why" of it, but the "how" - and if you did, that was seriously dick.
Posted by Circumvrent
at September 27, 2008 2:20 PM
comment #40
janee
says ...
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability clusters
Posted by janee
at May 18, 2011 4:11 AM