Pelham for Best Picture

email this story
read comments (74)
post a comment

My London trip allowed me to see Tony Scott's The Taking of Pelham 123 twice -- on the way over and the way back. And don't laugh but I think it deserves to be one of the ten Best Picture nominees. The idea in nominating ten is to promote and celebrate a movie or two that guys like Scott Foundas and Dennis Lim don't approve of, right? That Average Joes paid to see and actually enjoyed?

This is precisely the kind of shrewd, sharp-angled, deftly layered urban thriller that high-end Hollywood filmmakers like Scott are better at making than anyone else in the world. And I'm convinced after watching The Taking of Pelham 123 that it's a damn near perfect film for what it is. The sucker never lags or falls into clicheville, it has a crafty plot with well-massaged characterization, it's always psychologically complex or at least diverting, it delivers first-rate performances and just rocks out up and down.

And so somewhere over the Atlantic I began asking myself why a film as well-made and fully engaging as this one can't be nominated for Best Picture? Because it's a summer movie and summer movies don't win awards? Of course they don't, and of course this one can't. The suggestion is to pop Pelham into the ranks of Best Picture contenders in order to round out the pack and toss a bone to the lowbrows and guilty-pleasure fixaters like myself.

What are the most likely ten Best Picture nominees at this stage? Up In The Air, Invictus, The Hurt Locker, An Education, Nine and A Serious Man. These are the six locks, in my view. Then you have Bright Star (maybe), Up (maybe but what's the reason to lift it out of the Best Animated Feature category?), Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire (probably but it's so grim and dark, and isn't it more of a performance film than a rock-solid cinematic achievement?), and possibly A Single Man.

I don't think these last four are locks at all, and you can argue, I suppose, that A Serious Man might not be a given either. But any way you slice it there's not a popcorn-muncher among these, and shouldn't there be? At least one, I mean?

Early last June I wrote that The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 is "an unquestionably better film -- more rousing and flavorful, zippier and craftier -- than the 1974 Joseph Sargent original. It's a very satisfying summer-crime fuckall flick. A retread, yes, but with an attitude all its own...pow!

"Scott's Pelham is first-rate crackerjack escapism because (a) it knows itself and is true to that, (b) it's content to operate in its own realm (i.e., isn't trying to top the chase sequences, effects and explosions in the last big urban actioner...it's not playing that game) and (c) it's just a solid all-around popcorn movie, full of focus and discipline.

"Scott exhibits the same precision and intelligent pizazz he used for Man on Fire and Crimson Tide. Is Pelham some kind of drop-to-your-knees golden fleece movie? No -- just another urban slam-banger but smart, clever and muscle-car sweet.

"The New York subway-kidnap hostage thriller has more intricate plotting than the '74 film, richer characterizations of the top MTA guy (Denzel Washington in the old Walter Matthau role) and top-dog hostage-taking badass (John Travolta in the Robert Shaw role) and a slew of supporting performances across the board that are much more vivid and interesting than those from the class of '74, and at the same time less broad and farcical.

"Plus the Travolta and Washington characters are more psychologically layered; more work has put into their rationales and backstories. In hindsight Matthau's performance seems humdrum and almost glib in comparison to Washington's. And Travolta...my God, he's a friggin' madman in this thing! Fierce, irate, flying off the handle, lunging -- his finest bad guy since the 'ain't it cool?' guy in Broken Arrow.

"And James Gandolfini's New York Mayor isn't the buffoon figure from the '74 film -- he's playing a rationale, practical, somewhat full-of-shit politician, and he does so with an unforced attitude..

"The 2009 Pelham was made by a guy who understands and respects the original, and who sincerely wanted to make a better film -- and he did! Integrating it very nicely and believably into a 2009 realm. And very grippingly and thrillingly. There's no boredom to be had, and it never overcranks it. "

Northern Lights<< previous | next >>Back Pages

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on October 16, 2009 at 2:22 PM

comment #1

Blepyrus says ...

No way. Exercise in high style and predictable storytelling. Ok film at best. Travolta was the best thing.

Posted by Blepyrus at October 16, 2009 3:17 PM

comment #2

Gabriel says ...

Surely you jest, and/or seek a raucous mob. If Denzel becoming a gun-carrying, thief-chasing action hero in the third act isn't both a lightrail to Clicheville AND an affront to the very nature of characterization, I don't know what qualifies.

Posted by Gabriel at October 16, 2009 3:19 PM

comment #3

Jeffrey Kunze says ...

Wow. I haven't actually posted on this blog in like a year, but this post just broke me.

Your fucking smoking something Wells.

And I want me some.

Posted by Jeffrey Kunze at October 16, 2009 3:42 PM

comment #4

great scott says ...

Last June, while waiting in line for The Hangover, some man went up to the ticket window and asked for a ticket to see this.

The guy on the other side of the glass asked which showtime he wanted to see, the one that started twenty minutes earlier or the 2:30 show.

The man said, "Doesn't it start at 1:23?" He actually thought 1:23 was the time the movie "The Taking of Pelham" started.

True story. Maybe Bill Maher is right and people are just stupid. And this movie will get a Best Picture nomination the day Jeff becomes a Republican.

Posted by great scott at October 16, 2009 3:47 PM

comment #5

kneelbeforezod says ...

My favourite part of this film was the kid with a wifi connection on the subway... having a fullscreen webcam chat with his girlfriend.... and the terrorists never notice.... and then later she starts nagging him to tell her he loves her even though he's tied up on the floor in the middle of a hostage crisis..... and then the laptop battery dies..... until about half an hour later during the runaway train climax where it inexplicably comes back to life...... and the girlfriend IS STILL ON WEBCAM...... and the kid says "I FUCKING LOVE YOU".

I think this is known as contempt for the audience.

Posted by kneelbeforezod at October 16, 2009 4:10 PM

comment #6

Noah Cross says ...

More likely than Pelham?

District 9
Julie and Julia
(500) Days of Summer
Star Trek
and...of course, Inglourious Basterds is much more likely to be nominated than Pelham

And I prefered Zombieland

Posted by Noah Cross at October 16, 2009 4:23 PM

comment #7

LexG says ...

HELL YES.

It's definitely not as good as Man on Fire or Crimson Tide or Enemy of the State or Domino, but really, why not? Tony continues to be THE single most underappreciated major filmmaker of the last 30 years-- funny how guys like Fincher and Danny Boyle are considered FILM GODS already in their rather young careers, but THE GUY WHO SO CLEARLY INFLUENCED THEM, and almost every major mainstream film director since the mid-80s, is written off as the slicked-up version of his tonier older brother.

There's more visual panache and production design brilliance in any ONE SHOT of any Tony Scott movie than some acclaimed directors manage in their entire ouevre. The guy's LONG OVERDUE for some legit acclaim... a lot of you guys are way behind on this-- Manohla and Wells and Ebert and Gliebermann have been singing Tony's praises for over a decade. His movies are more alive and more entertaining and deliver on what they promise better than just about anyone else in the game...

all that said, Pelham is still pretty far down on his filmography.

Posted by LexG at October 16, 2009 4:26 PM

comment #8

The Hoyk says ...

My friend, the unique and mercurial critic and social observer Kim Nicolini, agrees that this is a great and important film:

http://www.counterpunch.org/nicolini07032009.html#

That being said, I hated this movie, your assertion that it's better than the original continues to boggle me, and it has about as much of a chance of getting a Best Picture nomination as KILLSHOT.

Posted by The Hoyk at October 16, 2009 4:30 PM

comment #9

btwnproductions says ...

No way this train's pulling into Oscar's station.

Posted by btwnproductions at October 16, 2009 4:30 PM

comment #10

Gordon27 says ...

"But any way you slice it there's not a popcorn-muncher among these, and shouldn't there be? At least one, I mean?"

'Inglourious Basterds' will fill that niche, and 'District 9' is significantly more likely than 'Pelham'.

Though I'm really surprised at how hard they're pushing the idea of 'Star Trek' getting a nod.

"The sucker never lags or falls into clicheville, it has a crafty plot with well-massaged characterization, it's always psychologically complex or at least diverting, it delivers first-rate performances and just rocks out up and down."

You're slipping, Jeff. It's a fine movie, but it's none of the things you're saying here. It is most especially not not-cliched.

Posted by Gordon27 at October 16, 2009 4:35 PM

comment #11

Phreaker says ...

Lol, no shot. For various reasons. It's a remake of a beloved movie, for starters, and you really have to be Martin Scorsese to pull that off. If they would go more mainstream you're talking more about Julie & Julia, Star Trek, Avatar, etc.

Posted by Phreaker at October 16, 2009 4:57 PM

comment #12

Terry McCarty says ...

btwnproductions wrote:
No way this train's pulling into Oscar's station.

Agree. And the above statement somehow reminds me of the parody Walter Monheit movie pullquotes that used to appear in SPY.

Posted by Terry McCarty at October 16, 2009 4:59 PM

comment #13

G.N.A. says ...

I still can't believe they're actually going to have 10 films nominated. Whose bad idea was this? To me, it kills the fun and suspense of guessing which films get in and which ones get the shaft, like The Dark Knight last year.

It also means Harvey Weinstein won't have to work as hard to get his latest mediocrity (CIDER HOUSE RULES, THE READER, CHOCOLAT, and so on) an undeserved Best Picture nomination.

Posted by G.N.A. at October 16, 2009 5:04 PM

comment #14

lawnorder says ...

How can you say NINE or INVICTUS is a lock for a Best Pic nomination when no one has seen them yet. I guarantee you that one or both falls short. My bet is that NINE turns out to be a big stinker that even Daniel Day Lewis can't save. INVICTUS feels like Americans playing South Africans again a la CRY FREEDOM and A DRY WHITE SEASON and it probably won't feel that authentic or compelling as had it been acted and directed by South Africans.

Tony Scott should have been nominated for an Oscar, but not for PELHAM. He should have been nominated for MAN ON FIRE. Maybe should have won, too.

Posted by lawnorder at October 16, 2009 6:08 PM

comment #15

Alexander says ...

Exactly, GNA.

Posted by Alexander at October 16, 2009 6:16 PM

comment #16

Alexander says ...

If the ten-Best Picture nominees policy allowed for intriguing choices of all kinds--the smallest of the small such as Goodbye Solo or the more offbeat such as Adventureland, the decision might have been worth rhapsodizing over. But it only means that more mediocre Oscar bait such as Cold Mountain, Walk the Line, Dreamgirls, Revolutionary Road and others will get in. Nomination-round upsets will be things of the past.

So now we all have to suffer because AMPAS chose The Reader over The Dark Knight. Thanks, Harvey.

Posted by Alexander at October 16, 2009 6:19 PM

comment #17

btwnproductions says ...

I realize once I wrote it that I was channeling Monheit.

Posted by btwnproductions at October 16, 2009 6:29 PM

comment #18

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

I sort of defy you to prove that Fincher was heavily influenced by Tony Scott. Ridley? Okay. Finch frequently cites Alien as one of his favorites, and one of the films that motivated him into the business of making movies in the first place. And you can see it -- especially in his more wrenching, earlier work like Seven, The Game, and (obviously) Alien 3.

I'm sorry, but I don't even think Tony's a very good filmmaker, esp. now with his coked-out, ADD-addled style (I've hated a good 80% of his last 4/5 movies). I'll give him credit for some nice setpieces in Enemy of the State, but Crimson Tide was all about Hackman/Washington and True Romance just did its best not to fuck up a fantastic early Tarantino script (and nearly failed, at that). Top Gun/Beverly Hills Cop II/Days of Thunder are clearly commercially influential, but in all the wrong ways, IMHO. They definitely employ that crass, late-80s, empty aesthetic.

Most underappreciated major filmmaker of the last 30 years? Try most over-appreciated.

Posted by CitizenKanedforChewingGum at October 16, 2009 6:45 PM

comment #19

Josh Massey says ...

It had a good hour - but then came the most mind-numbingly retarded ending of any movie I've seen this year. An ending so bad it completely destroyed any good will I had toward the first part.

Posted by Josh Massey at October 16, 2009 6:46 PM

comment #20

Alexander says ...

Tony Scott's Pelham was mind-numbingly awful.

Posted by Alexander at October 16, 2009 7:05 PM

comment #21

BurmaShave says ...

"That Average Joes paid to see and actually enjoyed?" Except it kind of bombed didn't it... Travolta was by far the highlight, motherfucker. And yeah, if it's gonna be one for the plebes it should definitely be DISTRICT 9, which was singular, out of the blue huge and awe-inspiring.

Posted by BurmaShave at October 16, 2009 7:19 PM

comment #22

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

And yeah, the Pelham remake was utterly mediocre. One of those real downward-spiral type of films. I rather enjoyed the first act, was indifferent to the second, and downright hated the last 35-40 mins. of this thing.

Posted by CitizenKanedforChewingGum at October 16, 2009 7:19 PM

comment #23

Postavant says ...

Eh, I think that Adventureland, The Brothers Bloom, and Watchmen should all be shoo-ins. We have our favorites that nobody else can see the worth in.

Posted by Postavant at October 16, 2009 8:24 PM

comment #24

The Winchester says ...

I just thought Travolta was ridiculous, and took away from a decent thriller and a fun Washington performance.

And I agree about District 9 or Inglorious Basterds being the "one for the masses"

Posted by The Winchester at October 16, 2009 8:38 PM

comment #25

Pynchon8 says ...

Just read that Oscars are still w/o producer, a slot apparently locked up in September most years. Considering all the work necessary to incorporate a new element I gotta think the ten films bit is gonna be a disaster.

Scott's got chops but any time he cuts or throws text on screen or shows an animal reaction shot it is to excess.

Posted by Pynchon8 at October 16, 2009 8:55 PM

comment #26

BurmaShave says ...

Postavant, just watched it tonight. THE BROTHERS BLOOM is really, really good. A bunch of people (Wells included) had their heads up their asses on that one. Ruffalo and Weisz certainly need to be in the hunt.

Posted by BurmaShave at October 16, 2009 9:23 PM

comment #27

Postavant says ...

Just Ruffalo and Weisz? Let's bring Rinko Kikuchi back into this equation! Sure, she was nearly playing the same kind of character that she got all that recognition for in Babel, but she was absolutely terrific in Bloom. Hell, everything in that movie is fantastic. Rian Johnson is probably the best new filmmaker around at the moment, and he really needs to be followed a whole lot more closely.

Posted by Postavant at October 16, 2009 9:28 PM

comment #28

Muscle McGurk says ...

A year's worth of spitting on the elephants and now we're so concerned about throwing them a bone?

I anxiously await Jeff's endorsement of Palin for President in 2012.

Posted by Muscle McGurk at October 16, 2009 10:01 PM

comment #29

Chase Kahn says ...

This film blows. I think Tony Scott hired an ice-skater to be his camera operator.

Owen Roizman kicks Tony Scott's ass any day. A pointless sequel to match Travolta's pointless over-cussing.

Posted by Chase Kahn at October 16, 2009 10:28 PM

comment #30

Cadavra says ...

"an unquestionably better film -- more rousing and flavorful, zippier and craftier -- than the 1974 Joseph Sargent original."

In a related story, Wells also thinks Bush was a better President than Obama.

Posted by Cadavra at October 16, 2009 11:23 PM

comment #31

The Winchester says ...

If RInko didn't get naked in Bloom, she won't get a nom.

But Weisz deserves it, she's magical in that flick.

And kudos to whoever brought up Travolta's overcussing. He swears like an 8-year old that just discovered the word "fuck". (But perhaps Wells, having caught the airline version, could easily overlook this.)

Posted by The Winchester at October 17, 2009 12:19 AM

comment #32

Gordon27 says ...

Maybe I'm alone, but I love latter-day, over-the-top ridiculous Travolta performances. He's really funny in 'Wild Hogs' (or, anyway, the bits I've seen; it's a really unwatchable movie), and he's ridiculous in 'Hairspray' and this and 'The Punisher'. They're mostly not good movies (I dig 'Hairspray' overall), but I like him way better than when he was trying to be a real actor in the late '90's.

Posted by Gordon27 at October 17, 2009 12:22 AM

comment #33

The Winchester says ...

"He's really funny in 'Wild Hogs'"

Careful, them's fightin words round these parts.

Posted by The Winchester at October 17, 2009 12:25 AM

comment #34

Gordon27 says ...

Believe me, I was as surprised as anybody. His line reading on "My cell phone! I had all my data in there!" reminds me of my all-time favorite weird Travolta line reading, "You are so fucking weird, you know that?" from 'Carrie'.

The movie itself is literally impossible to sit through for more than a ten minute stretch at a time, so I feel confident that nobody can disagree with me.

Posted by Gordon27 at October 17, 2009 12:42 AM

comment #35

bfm says ...

Maybe Travolta will attract some sympathy votes after the death of his son/extortion case/apparently renouncing scientology.

Posted by bfm at October 17, 2009 1:10 AM

comment #36

COCO says ...

YES.....Thanks Jeff for the look back.....with the new number at 10....well why not?.....it is a sharp, urban film....quick cuts...tension.....clock countdown.....the political mayor with a heart.....
flawed hero.....fucked up bad ass JT......New York
attitude......this film kept me interested.

Posted by COCO at October 17, 2009 5:31 AM

comment #37

actionman says ...

Love the idea, Wells. Totally agree. Watching that slick fan-made trailer (what song is that?) made me remember how much I loved this movie. Tony Scott is a visual genius; his artistry has grown over the last 20 years in a way that so few of his contemporaries could ever achieve. His style is impressionistic, almost cubist in nature; I still regard Domino as one of the decade's best pictures.

But yeah, Pelham, tight movie, juicy script, beefy performances...what kind of "man" couldn't enjoy this movie?

Posted by actionman at October 17, 2009 5:44 AM

comment #38

JBM... says ...

@actionman: Sam Sparro - "Black & Gold"

Posted by JBM... at October 17, 2009 6:31 AM

comment #39

chris7crows says ...

Watched the "Pelham" remake just last week and thought it was a passable bit of cheap, exciting, logic-free Hollywood filmmaking -- but better than the original? No way, and certainly not deserving of an Oscar nomination.

But nice to see some love for "Brothers Bloom," my favorite movie of the year.

Ditto "District 9" and "Inglorious Basterds" for noms long before "Pelham"; for that matter, "Zombieland" is more deserving of an Oscar nod.

Posted by chris7crows at October 17, 2009 8:07 AM

comment #40

chris7crows says ...

Actually, let me put it this way: I enjoyed the "Pelham" remake in precisely the same way I enjoyed "Diehard 4.0." Take that as you will.

Posted by chris7crows at October 17, 2009 8:08 AM

comment #41

James Rocchi says ...

Sorry, Jeff. The original Pelham is a great (maybe the best) New York movie wrapped around a crime film; this new one is a crime film that happens to take place in New York. The New Pelham isn't a patch on the original; it's even a damn sight less interesting than the under-rated Inside Man.

Also, I'll say it again: DOubling BP noms to ten films? Idiotic.

Oscar should have 1) Upped Picture, Director, Both screenplays and all four acting noms to 8 to broaden the pool. without diluting it 2) Put in a mathematical provision that at least 30% of the BP noms must be from the Jan-June release period and 3) State that you must play 20 cities, not just NY-LA, to qualify for nomination to prevent a L.A. - N.Y-centric nominee pool that leaves America out of it. (I know this would cost studios money. Boo Hoo.)

Doubling Best Picture to Ten without any other real changes is like spray painting a termite-gnawed house gold.

Posted by James Rocchi at October 17, 2009 9:04 AM

comment #42

sashastone says ...

James, I disagree with you - maybe it's a matter of one change that may inspire others. Also, this isn't the best year for them to expand to ten, as the movie slate seems pretty bare. But last year would have been a great year for this.

The biggest change may be the disconnect between a Best Pic winner and director. What I like about it is it breaks up the patterns we've been seeing lately, where a certain type of movie is awarded. This forces people to think outside the box - to see a film's potential in a different light, from the smallest to the biggest, from drama to comedy to horror to sci fi. I think you're seeing the results of it rather than what it might do to the race itself.

Posted by sashastone at October 17, 2009 9:58 AM

comment #43

Markj74 says ...

Why would 'Star Trek' be nominated for the Best Picture Oscar?

Posted by Markj74 at October 17, 2009 11:15 AM

comment #44

Cadavra says ...

Because it's a damn sight better than most of the other tentpole/franchise/CGI-heavy films of the year, and Academy members who will feel guilted into voting for at least one "big Hollywood" movie will consider it a safe choice.

Posted by Cadavra at October 17, 2009 12:02 PM

comment #45

poseidon72 says ...

I wouldn't say a best picture nominee but as this Summer movie season went Pelham was one of the very best.

Posted by poseidon72 at October 17, 2009 12:39 PM

comment #46

Chris H. says ...

I thought the high pont was the homage to the keystone kops during the money delivery 'chase'.

Posted by Chris H. at October 17, 2009 12:50 PM

comment #47

DeeZee says ...

Jeff: If it had nazis and Denzel was the bad guy, it might be nominated.

Posted by DeeZee at October 17, 2009 4:06 PM

comment #48

lawnorder says ...

God, I hated BROTHERS BLOOM. I loved BRICK and wanted to love BLOOM, but it's just a con movie in search of a con with pretentious scenes and characters - all going nowhere. And I fucking hate Adrian Brody's stupid hat. Glad this one didn't pull it over on the critics and public.

Posted by lawnorder at October 17, 2009 5:16 PM

comment #49

bmcintire says ...

Ugh. Seriously Jeff?
The never-ending sequence of just-in-time coincidences at the end of this thing made me actively HATE it while watching (even more aggravating than the object-in-envelope bullshit telegraphed throughout DRAG ME TO HELL).
Vocalizing "why didn't you just use a helicopter" (especially that late in the game) doesn't take away from its stupidity or Scott's pandering for a pointlessly extended chase sequence.
And seriously - if you're going to play the Terrorist Attack Card, fucking play it through. When it comes down to it, the triviality of this hijacking had about as much chance of radically affecting the stock market as a hostage situation at a Citibank branch in Mahnattan. Nonsense.

Posted by bmcintire at October 17, 2009 5:41 PM

comment #50

Mighty Kornholio says ...

lol now I wanna see this

Posted by Mighty Kornholio at October 17, 2009 7:19 PM

comment #51

K. Bowen says ...

While all the would-be important filmmakers were trying to turn Iraq into Vietnam, Scott went to Mexico and made a near-perfect film about the American psyche in this decade called MAN ON FIRE, a version of The Searchers and Taxi Driver for a new era and a film that gets American paradoxical and simultaneous tendencies toward moral virtue and moral blindness. Then he followed it with another one called DOMINO that fully lived out the craziness of the past ten years.

But I would agree that Pelham, while being decent and well-crafted in ways, isn't as riveting.

I love The Brothers Bloom, and all its tendencies toward screwball. It's like a reverse version of The Lady Eve, with a Hepburn-esque daffy heiress. And Adventureland is pretty darn good.

Posted by K. Bowen at October 18, 2009 7:42 AM

comment #52

K. Bowen says ...

And Weisz is great in Bloom. The moment she steals the book and spazzes out is one of the great moments in film this year.

Posted by K. Bowen at October 18, 2009 7:49 AM

comment #53

greengirl says ...

A place someone who can treat you as a king or who can spoil you like a queen, this is the great place---Militaryflirting.C O M ---!!!. It's dedicated for those military singles who are rich and successful to support and pamper military spouses who will treat you like a king and for women military admirers who are attractive and young to seek a generous benefactor to mentor and take care of you.

Posted by greengirl at October 19, 2009 3:08 AM

comment #54

Raden Beletz says ...

Nice information, valuable and excellent design, as share good stuff with good ideas and concepts, lots of great information and inspiration, both of which we all need, thanks for all the enthusiasm to offer such helpful information here.

Festival Museum Nusantara.
Kontes SEO bisnis syariah online produk herbal PT. Exer Indonesia rekomendasi MUI.
Peluang Usaha Ahasu Gnaulep.
Aku Cuma Seorang Blogger Yang Cinta Seo

Posted by Raden Beletz at January 7, 2010 3:27 PM

comment #55

piyenk says ...

Aku Cuma Seorang Blogger Yang Cinta Seo Fashion Magazine For Woman Style The Secret Of Beauty Andri Yarusman Berbagi Infromasi Menarik dan Tips Bermanfaat All About Photography Blog For Question Vintage On Net Aku Cuma Seorang Blogger Yang Cinta Seo

Posted by piyenk at January 8, 2010 6:44 PM

comment #56

piyenk says ...

Black Tungsten Wedding Bands

Posted by piyenk at January 8, 2010 6:45 PM

comment #57

Tutorial Digital says ...

Good info thanks for sharing with us.

Peace, Love, Unity and Respect.Lets Be a friendship on the net with around the world via internet.Lets be talk about lifestyle like Astaga.com lifestyle on the net.Kalau sempat berkunjunglah di laen waktu ke festival museum nusantara untuk sekedar melihat barang langka yang ada di museum.Luangkan juga waktu sejenak kalau tidak keberatan untuk berkunjung ke Astaga.com lifestyle on the net.

Best Regards,

========================================================

Astaga.com lifestyle on the net | Astaga.com lifestyle on the net | Festival Museum Nusantara on Tutorial Digital

Posted by Tutorial Digital at January 9, 2010 1:47 PM

comment #58

jimb12345 says ...

Any movie with Washington in it is going to be a hit. He is such an amazing actor. He is my favorite actor.
port arthur mesothelioma lawyers

Posted by jimb12345 at February 3, 2010 3:25 PM

Posted by draxc0la at February 8, 2010 11:45 AM

comment #60

winson says ...

best color laser printer
best small office color laser printer
hp color laserjet 1500l printer
hp color laserjet 2500
hp color laserjet 4600

Posted by winson at February 8, 2010 5:39 PM

comment #61

gaintwee says ...

What does this film have to gross to be considered successful? 300 million? For some reason, I feel like it compares to PJ's King Kong which did 218 million and no one seems to like. Online Criminal Justice school AND Online Diploma Programs AND Online history degree AND Nursing school AND Online chemistry degree

Posted by gaintwee at February 8, 2010 11:13 PM

comment #62

gaintwee says ...

aMAZING Online Performing Arts degree

Posted by gaintwee at February 8, 2010 11:16 PM

comment #63

adzegan says ...

free wallpaper stock | internet marketing | guide for your journey | internet technology information

Posted by adzegan at May 15, 2010 4:37 AM

comment #64

turk sikis says ...

evden eve
parca kontor
videoizle
oyun oyna
dizi izle
dizi izle
Turk Porno
liseli porno
full oyun
oyun arsivi
oyun indir
bedava oyunlar

Posted by turk sikis at June 10, 2010 4:03 PM

comment #65

turk sikis says ...

evden eve
parca kontor
videoizle
oyun oyna
dizi izle
dizi izle
Turk Porno
liseli porno
full oyun
oyun arsivi
oyun indir
bedava oyunlar

Posted by turk sikis at June 10, 2010 4:11 PM

comment #66

led tv ireland says ...

The Hurt Locker andd A Serious Man are great movies, already i saw them five times each.

Posted by led tv ireland at February 16, 2011 3:02 AM

comment #67

jamalinkoo says ...

Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!
Best regards, Mary, CEO of download youtube videos mp4 and iscsi windows 2008 server

Posted by jamalinkoo at March 31, 2011 7:53 AM

comment #68

Jack Brown says ...

The Taking of Pelham 123 was one great picture. I really enjoyed watching it on the big screen. medical supplies

Posted by Jack Brown at September 17, 2011 9:31 AM

comment #69

Jack Brown says ...

Even the new picture "The Unstoppable" which released in 2010 is great which is directed by this same director. foley catheter

Posted by Jack Brown at September 28, 2011 11:45 AM

comment #70

makcapri says ...

It is heal yeah!!!!!!!!
dissertation help

Posted by makcapri at October 2, 2011 11:57 AM

comment #71

oyun says ...

Maybe Bill Maher is right and people are just stupid. And this movie will get a Best Picture nomination the day Jeff becomes a Republican.
ben 10 oyunları kral oyun

Posted by oyun at October 4, 2011 7:44 AM

comment #72