Unsolvable

There’s an explanation, of course, for the mysterious 1928 cell-phone woman walking on the sidewalk near the premiere of Charlie Chaplin‘s The Circus on Hollywood Blvd. But one question never raised in this video is who she may be talking to.

34 thoughts on “Unsolvable

  1. actionman on said:

    utterlyfuckingmindblowing

  2. Serioulsy, the scuttlebutt is that it’s a hand held hearing aid. A cell phone would need a network and I’m sure the roaming charges in a parallel universe would make this cost prohibitive.

  3. She just bought a music box and can barely hear it on a busy street. She’s not talking, she’s singing along, or at least mouthing words.

  4. “A cell phone would need a network and I’m sure the roaming charges in a parallel universe would make this cost prohibitive.”

    Pretty sure time-travelers can figure out a solution to cellphone network issues.

  5. “Pretty sure time-travelers can figure out a solution to cellphone network issues. ”

    Pretty sure that an advanced civilization that could muster the electro magnetic power necessary to warp space, surely has better communication methods than cell phones.

  6. “Pretty sure that an advanced civilization that could muster the electro magnetic power necessary to warp space, surely has better communication methods than cell phones.”

    They’re probably from so far ahead in the future that the 20th Century all merges together in their mind. So they think that using a cellphone will help them blend in.

  7. Maybe she was originally holding a gun until Chaplin asked that they replace it with a walkie-talkie for a more family-friendly film.

  8. Absolutely without a doubt that IS a cell phone. There is NO WAY it could possibly be anything else. She is from the future.

    in other news…..

    Laugh for laugh “The Circus” is the funniest Chaplin movie of all time. Maybe not the greatest, or the best, but the funniest. The tightrope scene is a thing of beauty.

    And that pic of Jacki Weaver glaring at us on the side banners is really starting to bring me down.

  9. On one hand, I want to rip into anybody taking this evenly remotely serious.

    On the other, it’s hard to argue with the logic. Time travel is theoretically possible so even though it sounds fucking idiotic to say, I guess it’s possible that she’s from something like the year 3000.

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    Mr. F: I laughed.

  10. Despite his statement otherwise, she is using an ear trumpet (she needs it for traffic noises at the intersections). She is chewing something, singing to herself, or talking to herself. Lord help us if this guy ever tries to analyze the Zapruder film.

  11. Wow, the first time in recorded history of a woman walking along, talking to herself, while touching the side of her head. Such a feat was surely impossible before the invention of the cell phone. Therefore, she is a time-traveller.

    What retarded bullshit.

  12. Time travel is theoretically possible, we just lack the specific technology to implement it. Travel to the future is absolutely possible if you are in a spacecraft that is approaching the speed of light. Time is slow for the traveler, while a lot of time goes by on earth. We just don’t have the technology to travel that fast right now. Travel to the past is trickier, but if string theory pans out there are ways, but the past you would travle into would appear to be like ours, but would really be into a parallel version of our past.

  13. Time travel into the future is indeed possible — I’m LIVING PROOF.

    Every time I close my eyes at night, I open them up and I’ve traveled *8 hours* into the future. (Sometimes more if I’ve been drinking.)

    Wow, this is a silly thread. But lots of good comedy out of it, so…

  14. I would think that there would be better ways to communicate than cell phones if society found a way to go back in time.

    Also, why wasn’t the guy who directed this asking “what the fuck is she doing?”, and not use the footage? Unless that happened from time to time, the audience would be baffled by this strange act.

    I think we need to get a historian over here to analyze this.

  15. Jesus, now I sound ridiculous. For the record, I do not believe that this person is a time traveler. Yeah, she’s likely holding her hearing aid or whatever.

    I was only saying that it is theoretically possible that she has technology from beyond her era. Just as it’s possible to say the junkie mumbling somewhat coherently to himself at the bus stop is Bruce Willis from 12 Monkeys.

    We can’t know. We won’t know, and Bruce Willis is usually wrong about everything. Why make a thing out of it?

  16. The denial here is staggering but to be expected from such mainstream types.

    This woman is CLEARLY a time traveler. They didn’t have schizophrenia back then, hadn’t been invented yet.

  17. Boy, you can really tell this is a forum with a dearth of both women and those of us who live with them.

    If she isn’t simply shielding her eyes from the sun, the most rationale explanation is she has one of those period hats with netting. Look at the spacing of her fingers as she turns.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>