Kasdan Needs To Up Game

I’m leaving Park City today and arriving late this evening at the Santa Barbara Film Festival, which kicked off last night. The opener was Lawrence Kasdan‘s Darling Companion (Sony Classics, 4.20), a lost dog movie which is very, very slight. Variety‘s Lael Lowenstein said it “won’t be long before this one turns up at the Netflix pound.”

It’s basically about an older, well-to-do Denver couple (Kevin Kline, Diane Keaton) getting in touch with their issues through a relationship with a mixed collie they’ve adopted after Keaton and her daughter (Elisabeth Moss) find him huddling on the side of a road. The dog is soon being attended to by a friendly vet (Jay Ali), enjoying a nice hot bath, and given the name of Freeway.

During a Rocky Mountain vacation Kline, an emotionally curt surgeon who’s constantly phoning and texting, lets Freeway slip the leash…gone. Keaton, emotionally invested in her relationship with Freeway in lieu of a dry and distant one with Kline, is hugely pissed and is soon leading a major log-cabin campaign to find the dog. Helping out are Kline’s sister (Dianne Wiest), her easygoing boyfriend (Richard Jenkins), Penny’s doctor son (Mark Duplass) and a sexy exotic European (Ayelet Zurer) who has gypsy-like, extra-sensory insight into Freeway’s whereabouts. And a local sheriff (Sam Shepard) is aware of the hunt and peripherally involved.

I thought maybe Kasdan might be up to something clever here. Perhaps using the lost-dog plot as a way into a kind of Big Chill flick about four or five old farts hanging around a Rocky Mountain cabin and evaluating their lives and times…something like that. But for the most part, Darling Companion is just about finding the dog. Okay, Kline comes around to admitting that he’s too aloof and work-oriented, but this is hardly the stuff of keen audience engagement.

A septugenarian Big Chill would make sense as Kasdan isn’t concerned in the least with Freeway’s whereabouts or adventures. All we do is hang out with the oldsters and Duplass and Zurer and blah blah, and then the story comes to a nice wholesome conclusion.

At one point Kline and Jenkins encounter a kind of Unabomber guy living in a rundown cabin in the woods, and there’s an implication that Freeway might have been kidnapped and/or is being held by this dog of a human being, but this possibility is quickly discarded.

Why does Freeway run away from Kline in the first place? Dogs don’t just run away from their masters. Are we to suppose that Freeway is just as put off by Kline’s selfish cell-phone existence and can’t wait to escape his company? That’s a stretch.

Darling Companion made me feel really old on top of everything else. I’ve known Kline, Keaton, Weist and Shepard since the late ’70s and early ’80s, and they’re all looking and especially acting like people in their late 60s and early 70s with their aching joints and arms falling out of their sockets and their gray hair and Shepard’s teeth looking small and gnarly with his pot belly hanging out…Jesus! Shepard was a smooth romantic figure in the ’80s.

If you’re going to be an older working actor, you have to look younger than you are. That’s the rule. If you’re 75, you have to look 60 or 65 after you’ve just had a facial and been worked on by a skilled hair colorist (i.e., a little gray around the edges). If you’re 60 or 65, you have to look like a 50 or 55 year-old physical trainer. No limping, no paunch, in good shape, no complaining about aching joints. Because I’m telling you it’s really depressing to watch Kline and Keaton stumbling along a mountain trail like refugees from a retirement community.

And yet the film’s best scene happens on that same mountain trail when Kline’s right arm becomes dislocated and Keaton has to help him pop it back in.

My basic reaction as I left the screening room was “why is Kasdan degrading his once-proud brand with a feathery little project like this? A movie about finding a fucking dog in the Rocky Mountains? That‘s what the once-great Kasdan is up to?”

Kasdan’s last truly tasty film, Mumford, came out 12 and a half years ago. I will never stop respecting or believing in his craft and vision, but over the last decade he’s generally been regarded by the media mob as M.I.A. or “on hold” or past it. As soon as I heard about Darling Companion I began wondering if it’s a potential rebound or a place-holder or what. Because my suspicions were, no offense, skeptical. And now I know — it’s a place-holder. It’s actually kind of a mild embarassment.

I don’t mean to speak dismissively of one of the strongest and most distinctive director-screenwriters of the ’80s and ’90s. Body Heat, The Big Chill, Silverado, The Accidental Tourist, Grand Canyon, Wyatt Earp, Mumford — that’s a hell of a 20-year run. But writer-directors have only so much psychic essence, and the prevailing view is that after they’ve shot their wad (as most wads are lamentably finite), that’s it.

For whatever reason Kasdan tells us that the mountain-search portion of the film is happening in Telluride, Colorado, as we’re shown an establishing shot of Telluride’s main street. But it was shot in and around Park City’s Wasatch Mountains. I’m betting that part of the pitch to the Darling actors was “you get a nice five or six-week vacation in the Rockies as part of the deal.”

21 thoughts on “Kasdan Needs To Up Game

  1. Pretty brutal stuff all around, Jeff, but truthful. Time is no friend to anyone’s physicality, and the loss of Kasdan’s mojo has been frustrating.

    However, I’ve seen PLENTY of dogs run away from their masters. Perhaps it’s a country thing and doesn’t occur too much in urbanized areas, but out here in flyover land, it happens all the time.

  2. Jeff’s statement that if you’re 75, you have to look 60 or 65, caught my eye. I had just been looking at some set photos of Robert Redford in “The Company You Keep” filmed last fall in British Columbia.It was uncanny as Redford seemed to be following Jeff’s instructions right down to using an expert hair colorist.

    It is still great to see the old pros on screen, including Kline and Keaton. I’m looking forward to Clint Eastwood’s return to acting at 80 plus in his new film about an elderly baseball scout.

    And I’m not that sure about Redford’s hair. I seem to remember one story that quoted Redford’s children telling him to stop coloring his hair, only to be told that is its real color.

  3. There’s nothing more reassuring to me than when I see a 60-70 year old guy at the gym, working out and staying in great shape…

    The hair coloring comment is true for women, but NOT for guys. AT ALL. Paul Newman? Hell no. Burt Lancaster? Hell no. George Clooney? Hell no. Get some color in your face, stay fit, and embrace the silver fox thing. Or pull a Jack Nicholson in About Schmidt and do the exact opposite to amazing but grim results.

  4. Holy SHIT, does this look terrible. Easily a very early contender for worst trailer of the year.

    There’s only one thing and one thing only I care about regarding this flick: whose sexy feet at the :50 mark? Gotta be either Moss or Zurer (whoever the hell that really is).

    Also: Jeff, what’s with the fanatical Kasdan-worship? I always figured that behavior was usually reserved for the people who sprung up boners based on the 1-2 punch of his earliest work — the screenplays to a couple of the most iconic, and geek-friendly, properties of the ’80s.(admittedly very solid, but it’s very arguable how integral he ultimately was to the success of those flicks, especially in the case of Empire).

  5. Yeah, I always wondered if EARP broke something in him, or he got jammed up making amends…I still remember seeing FRENCH KISS and coming out of it saying, “Shit, he’s stuck in industry penance mode.”

  6. (Continued)

    Body Heat‘s an unabashed masterpiece, but — outside of that — I never really got the love for him as this auteurish writer/director. Aren’t guys like that generally supposed to bring something to the table that makes you want to watch their films over & over again — whether it be uniquely great dialogue like a Tarantino/Allen, a crisp visual sheen a la Aronofsky/Tarsem, or even an unmistakable sense of atmosphere in the vein of Polanski or Noe?

  7. (Part 3)

    Can anyone name a legitimate Kasdan “trademark?” Has anyone ever tried re-watching 1 of his directorial efforts a full decade on and been impressed with how well it actually held up? I rarely even see DVDs of his flicks in bargain bins at Wal-Marts. They’re usually good for about a 2-4 year run on cable before being officially retired, and (rightfully) fading into complete cinematic obscurity.

    P.S. Is there a particular reason I can’t post more than about two paragraphs at a time? Commandante Wells have anyone else on a word count?

  8. I’ll tell you what’s more tragic by a long shot than Kasdan’s trajectory — seeing Sam Shepard doing cracker/good ol’boy/marshall-and-or-military supporting bits instead of holing up somewhere and dragging another TRUE WEST or PARIS, TEXAS out of himself.

  9. I don’t think much of this trailer, but yeah, I’m a big fan of Kasdan. I really don’t care if he brings a legitimate trademark to each film. He’s an old school type of director (like Eastwood) that cares more about the story being told than he does about style.

    I love The Big Chill, Silverado, Body Heat, Grand Canyon, Mumford, and The Accidental Tourist. Lets also give him tons of credit for his huge contributions to Star Wars and Indiana Jones.

  10. The actors have all looked up to par in other recent movies; it’s likely that warts-and-all, let-it-all-hang-out was what Kasdan wanted.

  11. Kasdan’s great because he jumped genres with such aplomb. Sci-fi, drama, comedy, horror & western. And he always seemed jazzed doing it… a Tarantino level of movie lover, without the geek ADHD. The movies aren’t all great but the bits and pieces are.

    I Love You To Death is a witches brew.

  12. Fuck yeah, Peterzee.

    However, his performance in The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford was the shit. And here’s hoping he makes a impression in Jeff Nichols’ Mud.

  13. When I saw the trailer my thought was: Does Diane Keaton have to wear glasses and usual hairdo in every movie she’s been in since… I don’t remember which, but come on, what about a makeover for the next one? Her looks basically rotate with her from one movie to another. Maybe a change of her appearance would open her field to better projects. Just saying…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>